Predictable   4 comments

As soon as I saw the first post reporting that Gabrielle Giffords had been shot and that Giffords was one of the Democratic representatives “targeted” by Palin, I knew two things were about to happen in the lefty blogosphere.

  1. A slew of angry bloggers and Twitterers would single out Palin as the most pernicious of all right wing evils, hurling misogynist invective as they blame her for the shooting.
  2. A group of Hillary supporters would rush to Palin’s defense, denouncing not just the sexist attacks and death wishes but any and all attempts to connect right wing eliminationist rhetoric in general and Palin’s actions in particular to the Tucson shooting.

No matter that Giffords herself expressed concern about Palin’s crosshairs map back in March.
No matter that when asked, following the shooting, if his daughter had any enemies, Giffords’ father replied, “Yeah, the entire Tea Party.”
No matter that we have seen a marked increase in right-wing violence in recent years (note that the linked timeline documents only gun violence; it doesn’t include incidents such as the head stomping of the MoveOn member at the Rand Paul rally that was widely defended in Republican circles), much of it tied more or less directly to the inflammatory rhetoric of Beck, Limbaugh, Palin, O’Reilly, etc.

No, none of that mattered. Anyone who speculated about the effect Palin’s rhetoric and crosshairs map may have had on the shooter was no different than people calling her a c*nt and wishing her dead.

Sadly, this knee-jerk defense of everything Palin says and does is nothing new, so the reactions of some of my favorite bloggers to the shooting were entirely predictable.

Palin is no different than other far right fundies, and attempts to single her out as the worst of the worst are often motivated by misogyny. That much is true. The irrational hatred many right-wingers have for Nancy Pelosi comes from the same place.

But while Palin is no worse than many other right-wing extremists, she’s also no better. I fail to comprehend the affection some on the left have for her. A friend of mine has suggested that many of us were so shell-shocked by the barrage of misogyny used against Clinton by supposed progressives during the 2008 Primary that when we saw the same sexist attacks deployed against Palin, an automatic transference of affection occurred in some people. The fact that Clinton’s and Palin’s views on just about everything are diametrically opposed to each other didn’t seem to matter.

Of course it’s entirely possible to defend Palin against sexism without losing sight of the fact that she is a morally reprehensible bigot. Indeed, quite a few of us have been doing just that. You don’t let sexism (or racism, or homophobia, etc.) go unchallenged just because you despise the target. That’s feminism 101. At least that’s what I thought pre-2008.

It’s also quite possible to detest Palin without being motivated by sexism. Sarah Palin is dangerous. Not because she has any chance of being elected President (she doesn’t), but because, like Glenn Beck, she is a propagandist adept at shifting the Overton window further and further to the right (example: Obama is “the most pro-abortion president to ever occupy the White House”). Palin routinely uses her substantial platform to spread lies and anti-government paranoia while demonizing her opposition. Even if no one picks up a gun to “defend” against the threats to life and liberty invented by Beck or Palin, the damage is done every time someone believes their lies. At best, the public opinions created by Palin and other right-wing propagandists give Republicans and conservadems cover for what they want to do anyway. At worst, Palin’s rhetoric and actions result in the election of dangerously backward individuals while diminishing public support for progressive legislation. We have seen countless examples of both last year.

As Gabrielle Giffords said in March 2010, rhetoric such as Palin’s has consequences. When the speaker’s name is Beck or Limbaugh, everyone on the left seems to get that. But because Palin has been (and continues to be) subject to sexist attacks, some believe all but the mildest criticism of her (and sometimes even that) to be motivated by sexism–much like some at the Big Orange believe all criticism of Obama is the result of racism.

Sarah Palin has been a victim of sexism and misogyny. She is also a morally bankrupt, war mongering, lying bigot. There. That wasn’t so hard.

NOTE: I’m not arguing that Jared Loughner was motivated by something Palin did or said except in the general sense that solving one’s problems with a Glock becomes more acceptable in a climate where violent, eliminationist rhetoric is permitted to thrive. That said, given the recent history of right-wing violence and the facts known in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, it was entirely reasonable to consider the possibility that Palin’s rhetoric influenced Loughner.


Posted January 18, 2011 by Sasha in Palin Apologists, Right-Wing Rhetoric, Sarah Palin

4 responses to “Predictable

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Glad to see you with your own blog. =)

    And great post! ITA about a certain section of the left blogosphere (sadly including several people that I like) who tend to reflexively defend Palin from nearly all criticism.

    Much as I love Violet, I basically ignore any of her posts having to do with anything Palin-related these days. Though at least she does usually go out of her way to point out she hates Palin’s politics. Worse are those who speak of her as someone who would actually be an acceptable President. Yes, the mainstream of both political parties suck. But to the extent she differs from them, she sucks worse (certainly than the democrats; the mainstream of the Republican party is moving in her direction).

  2. Didn’t think of this till after I hit “post”; there’s also a subset of Palin apologists who seem to have a lot of sympathy for the tea party. Which makes sense, if you like Palin’s politics, but again, they are if anything more socially conservative, ignorant and economically loopy than the mainstream Republicans, for the most part. The poeple who think the left can make common cause with them are, imo, horribly misreading this group. The more libertarian members on civil liberties, maybe, but otherwise? No. They are espousing corporatist economic idealogy, not populist.

  3. I finally had to stop reading The Confluence – my refuge during the 2008 primary – because of all the Palin love. Gee, I wonder why they need constant disclaimers that they’re a liberal blog. Coulda fooled me. When your comment threads are filled with people hoping that one of the most extreme right wingers is elected president you may want to rethink your message. No wonder Dakinikat left.

  4. Mojave_Wolf,

    Good to see you stop by.

    You’re right; it’s best to just avoid the Palin topic on certain blogs. I guess it just never ceases to amaze me how many people believe Obama’s conservatism is an outrage, but Palin is not half bad. Or, my personal favorite, “Well, of course her politics are atrocious, but she’s so likable.” Really?!? Someone who constantly tells the most egregious lies is likable? How about urging the President to attack Iran, purely for political gain? I mean, that shit is borderline sociopathic.

    Also agree regarding the Tea Party. These guys are not, by and large, the “downtrodden and dispossessed.” The average Tea Partier is wealthier than the average American, and their rallying cries are lower taxes and reduced government spending. They aren’t populists–at least not in the economic sense.

    I totally get that people are pissed off about the Dems complete failure to harness populist outrage but making common cause with social conservatives who believe in economic fairy tales–the trickle down fantasy–won’t help matters. I may write a post about this, but it’ll probably be a couple of days before I have the time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s